Sponsors
Motion
Section I
1.1 WHEREAS academic honesty is integral for maintaining an effective learning environment; and
1.2 WHEREAS to maintain an academically honest environment instructors must report academic misconduct to Student Conduct and Community Standards: and
1.3. WHEREAS accurate student course evaluations play a vital role in departmental governance and university hiring, retention, and promotion policies; and
1.4 WHEREAS a student who has been accused of academic misconduct has an inherent conflict of interest regarding course evaluations; and
1.5 WHEREAS concerns about student course evaluations may deter faculty members from reporting academic misconduct, and thereby create a conflict of interest where none otherwise would exist; and
1.6 WHEREAS the current course evaluation system does not allow the university to retroactively remove student course evaluations after reports on those evaluations have been prepared;
Section II
2.1 BE IT THEREFORE MOVED that if a student has been accussed of misconduct related to a class WITHIN ONE WEEK of the end of the final exam period shall have his/her numerical and narrative course evaluations for that class STRUCK FROM THE RECORD and from all averages of student evaluations; and
2.2 BE IT FURTHER MOVED that the Registrar's Office shall take all necessary actions to enforce this policy; and
2.3 BE IT FURTHER MOVED that the Registrar's Office shall enforce this policy beginning in the Fall Quarter of 2017; and
2.4 BE IT FURTHER MOVED that when the Registrar's Office considers recontracting the course evaluation system, the ability to remove student evaluations retroactively, for a period of at least one quarter, shall be a priority.